MARGINAL COSTING

Any costing accounting system in which variable costs are charged to cost units and fixed costs are written off against contribution.

  1.1 Marginal cost

The part of unit cost which would increase if one extra unit were produced (or be avoided if that unit were not produced).

 

  • Costs generated solely by a given cost unit, ie
    all unit direct costs + variable overhead per unit.

 

1.2 Contribution

Sales value less variable cost of sales. May be expressed per unit or in total.

1.3 In summary

2 ABSORPTION COSTING

In addition to direct costs, all production overheads are assigned to cost units by means of overhead absorption rates.

 2.1 Principle

 

3 STANDARD COST CARD

Example 1

Production data for 1 gromit

The variable overhead rate is £4 per direct labour hour.

The fixed overhead absorption rate is £7 per direct labour hour.

Budgeted production is 5,000 gromits.

Required

(a) Calculate the budgeted fixed overheads for the period.

(b) Determine the cost of a gromit on

     (i) a marginal costing basis
     (ii) an absorption costing basis.

 4 IMPACT ON STOCKS AND PROFIT

Example 2

Required

If, in Example 1, budgeted sales are 4,300 gromits at £40 each, calculate the budgeted profit for the period using

(i) marginal costing
(ii) absorption costing.

Example 3

Required

If all budgeted information is as in Example 2, calculate the actual profit, using AC, if actual production and sales were

(i) 4,500 gromits
(ii) 5,500 gromits.

4.1 The effect of changing stock levels on profit

Under AC opening and closing stock values will be higher than under MC because of the inclusion of fixed production costs.

As a result, the AC profit will be less than the MC profit.

In summary

 

 

4.2 Profit reconciliation

 

£

Marginal cost profit

 

Add: Increase/Less: decrease in profit

 

(Increase/(decrease) in stock level Fixed production overhead per unit)

 

 

_____

Absorption cost profit

 

 

_____

 

Example 4

Required

Reconcile the profits in Example 2.

Solution

 

£   

Marginal cost profit (per Solution 2 (i))

30,490

Increase/(decrease) in profit

 

 

______

Absorption cost profit (per Solution 2 (ii))

37,840

 

______

5 COMPARISON OF METHODS

 

Absorption costing

Marginal costing

 

5.1 Stock valuation

Conforms to IAS 2 Inventory for preparation of published financial a/cs

Over prudent valuation (not permitted by IAS 2)

 

5.2 Profit

Depends on sales volume and production therefore can manipulate by overstocking. Must adjust for any over /(under) absorption

Depends only on sales

 

5.3 Cost ascertainment

Avoids need to split semi-variable costs

Avoids allocation, apportionment and absorption

 

5.4 Decision-making

Fixed costs are normally irrelevant (as incurred anyway)

Contribution relevant

 

5.5 Cost control

Focuses on all costs therefore a reminder that all costs have to be covered in long term.

Focuses on controllable costs

EXAMPLE SOLUTIONS

Solution 1 – Standard cost cards

(a) Budgeted fixed overheads

Units × no of hours per unit × hourly rate

5,000 × 1.5 hrs × £7 = £52,500

(b)(i) Marginal cost (MC)

 

 

 

£  

 

Materials

2.4 kg @ £3 per kg

7.20

 

Direct labour

1.5 hrs @ £5 per hour

7.50

 

Variable overheads

1.5 hrs @ £4 per hour

6.00

 

 

 

_____

 

 

 

20.70

 

 

 

_____

(ii) Absorption cost (AC)

 

 

£  

 

Marginal cost (as above)

20.70

 

Plus: Fixed overheads 1.5 hrs @ £7 per hour

10.50

 

 

_____

 

 

31.20

 

 

_____

Solution 2 – Budgeted profits

(i) Marginal cost

Note SP per unit – MC per unit = Unit contribution

Total contribution – total fixed overheads = Profit

 

 

 

 

 

£   

 

Sales revenue (4,300 × £40)

 

172,000

 

Less:

Opening stock

–   

 

 

 

Marginal cost of production

 

 

 

 

(5,000 £20.70)

103,500

 

 

 

Closing stock (700 £20.70)

14,490

 

 

 

 

_______

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold (ie 4,300 × £20.70)

 

89,010

 

 

 

 

______

 

Total contribution (4,300 × £19.30)

 

82,990

 

Less:

Total fixed overheads

 

52,500

 

 

 

 

______

 

Profit

 

 

30,490

 

 

 

 

______

Alternatively

 

 

 

£   

£   

 

Sales revenue

 

172,000

 

Less:

Total cost of production

 

 

 

 

(5,000 × £31.20)

156,000

 

 

 

Closing stock (@ MC)

 

 

 

 

(700 × £20.70)

(14,490)

 

 

 

 

_______

 

 

 

 

 

141,510

 

 

 

 

_______

 

 

 

 

30,490

 

 

 

 

_______

Note When MC is used, no element of fixed overheads is included in the stock valuation stock is valued at MC and no fixed overheads are c/fwd, hence all fixed overheads are written off.

(ii) Absorption cost

 

 

 

£   

 

Sales revenue (4,300 × £40)

172,000

 

Less:

Opening stock

–   

 

 

Absorption cost of production (5,000 £31.20)

156,000

 

 

Closing stock (700 £31.20)

21,840

 

 

 

_______

 

 

Cost of goods sold (4,300 × £31.20)

134,160

 

 

 

_______

 

Profit

 

37,840

 

 

 

_______

Note As stock valuation includes an element of fixed overheads, not all fixed overheads are being written off.

Solution 3 – Changing stock levels

(i) Actually produce and sell 4,500 gromits

 

 

£   

 

Sales revenue (4,500 @ £40)

180,000  

 

Less: Total cost of production (@ AC) (4,500 @ £31.20)

140,400 †

 

 

______  

 

 

39,600  

 

Adjustment: Less fixed overheads under-absorbed

5,250  

 

 

______  

 

Profit

34,350  

 

 

______  

 

† includes a total of 4,500 × £10.50 = £47,250 of fixed overheads. Fixed overheads remain fixed at £52,500 therefore £5,250 of fixed overheads is underabsorbed.

(ii) Actually produce and sell 5,500 gromits

 

 

£    

 

Sales revenue (5,500 @ £40)

220,000  

 

Less: Total cost of production (@ AC) (5,500 @ £31.20)

171,600 *

 

 

_______  

 

 

48,400  

 

Adjustment: Add fixed overheads over-absorbed

5,250  

 

 

______  

 

Profit

53,650  

 

 

______  

 

* includes a total of 5,500 × £10.50 = £57,750 of fixed overheads. These remain fixed at £52,500 therefore £5,250 of fixed overheads is overabsorbed.

Solution 4 – Profit reconciliation

 

£   

Marginal cost profit (per Solution 2 (i))

30,490

Increase/(decrease) in profit

 

700 units £10.50

7,350

 

______

Absorption cost profit (per Solution 2 (ii))

37,840

 

______

COST BOOKKEEPING/COST ACCOUNTS

1.1 Description

1.2 Control accounts

Control a/cs with subsidiary records can be used for materials and wages in particular (also overheads) in just the same way, that a subsidiary trade receivables’ ledger supports a "trade receivable ledger control a/c" in the general (nominal) ledger.

1.3 Manufacturing overheads

1.4 Non-manufacturing overheads

2 INTEGRATED SYSTEMS

2.1 Description

A single set of accounting records providing both financial and cost accounts using a common input of data.

 

 

2.2 Basic cost a/c entries

3 AN INTERLOCKING SYSTEM

3.1 Description

Cost accounts are distinct from financial accounts but kept continually in agreement using control accounts (or reconciled by other means).

3.2 Comparison interlocking v integrated system

  • Interlocking – the books are divided into two ledgers: "the financial ledger" and the "cost ledger"

·  The "cost ledger control a/c" in the cost ledger is used to control the entries in the cost ledger and to make it self-balancing.

·  A "financial ledger control a/c" in the financial ledger is used to make the financial ledger self-balancing.

  • The profit & loss a/c in the cost ledger is called a "cost profit & loss a/c".

 

 3.3 Cost bookkeeping flowchart

Notes

In view of the difficulties of separating semi-variable overheads into their fixed and variable elements, a single (combined) production overhead (ie control) a/c and a single selling and administration overhead a/c may be used.

Question

Answer

 

4 COST LEDGER V FINANCIAL LEDGER

4.1 Comparison

4.2 Financial matters not reflected in cost a/cs

Examples

4.3 Cost items not in financial a/cs

Cost a/cs may include "notional" amounts for internal transactions.

Examples

4.4 Reconciliation of financial and cost profits